Making Europe a better place

"National problems, European solutions: Is the EU grass still greener?". This was the title of the European Youth Media Days, 2013 organized in Brussels by the Euroepan Parliament last October.

120 journalist from all Europe gathered together to work on this topic in different teams. The result of the workshop is here. Also, Rebecca Bengtsson, main coordinator of the program describes the importance of these activities:

There are also many other Euroepan initiatives that promotes the unity among its member states and that helps to create a better Union. Antonis Christakis, Vice President of Youthnet in Greece explains what the European Citizens´ Initiative means to him:

Finally, Ioannis Darmis, Head of the Media Services and Monitoring Unit, EP gives an overview about the role of the journalists to create a Union of people in Europe:

Now, it is the moment of thinking ahead. Next step, the European Elections 2014: "Act, React, Impact".

A join project to promote an European Society

The European Youth Media Days (EYMD) 2013 started today in Brussels with the support of the European Parliament (EP) . These three workshop´s days gather 120 professional and student journalists from all Europe with the purpose of "reflecting questions that something we [EP] forget", said Ioannis Darmis, Head of media services and monitoring unit of the EP.

The first day impressions, as they explained in the introduction speech, are that there are not national problems that countries can solve on their own. Europe needs to work at a higher level of integration. Othamar Karas, Vice President of the European Parliament in charge of communication expressed this way, "We need to act together" and in this democratic process journalists are needed to influence the decisions to be taken.

The most important thing is to create a fair, independent and responsible media where journalists should represent a true reality because Europe is not only black and white, but very diverse. As Karas highligtthed, "We are all Europe" and it is all at the interest of the community.

The problem of coverage
Breaking stereotyes -The role of media in promoting an inclusive European society- was the title of the last panel discussion of the day. Here, the crucial point is to know when coverage goes right and when goes wrong. What is the main responsibility? has it anything to be with ethics? influencing society? to what extend do we have resposibility as a journalists?

Journalists should not talk only about one side of the discussion, they need to have the complete picture of the situation, show the diversity and create a honest relation with readers. Tell the story as it is and do not reinforce steroetypes.

Journalists are the only ones who can research for the truth, show it their audience and create a more integrated Europe.

"National Problems: European Solutions?

Next 15th to 17th of October, the European Youth Media along with the European Parliament host the European Youth Media Days 2013 (EYMD) under the title; "National Problems, European solutions? Is the EU´s grass still greener?"

My workshop there is called "#EU- European policies online, is the EU keeping up eith the present times?" We need to know and analyze how the EP is communicating, what´s the strategy behind and what are they doing to improve the conncetion with people.

I believe this topic has a lot in common with the globalization movemetn. The social media has given us the opportunity to share and being in touch with everybody in the globe without barriers and this is a positive thing. However, it is necessary to regulate the web somehow and its contents, giving people alternatives, in the way everybody will be prepresented. Pluralism on the social media is important. Also, reaching people through Internet.

I would like to mention here the anti-globalization movements that took place in Seattle in 1999. This movement grew in importance thanks to the social media.

Nowadays, along with the economic crisis, the uncertainty about if the EU is going forward towards a more political intregation, or backwards towards a more national independence (instead of interdependence) is an important questions itself. I believe in the European Union, but it is visible that its primiry ideas has been distorted. We cannot fail again as it happened in the Copenhagen Summit in 2009. We need to work together to get out of this situation, to fight back stronger than ever and this initiatives (as well as the European Initiative for Media Pluralism) help to reach an agreement. The EU needs to provide alternatives to youth Europeans to gather together and maybe to make real the idea of the United States of Europe.

What did people take from the 10th EMN Conference?

The two days at the 10^th EMN Conference in Stockholm were very intense and productive. However, since there were many simultaneous debates, attendants could not assist to all of them. Therefore, several opinions are given to show a summary to the whole conference, as well as to know which sessions were more interesting for the assistants and what they take from each of them.

First of all, it will be necessary to highlight the success of the two Jasmine workshops. The first session (25^th of June) under the title “Innovative Technology services provision” was about the European Code of Good Conduct for Microcredit Provision (CGC). This Code is “a pilot project developed in the aftermath of a Communication on microcredit adopted by the Commission in November 2007 and also feeds on work carried out previously on the regulation of microcredit in Europe,” as they described during the session.

“The adoption of the principles of the CGC will be very important in order to access the different European programs during the next 2014-2020 period,” described Karl Dayson, from the University of Salford and member of the Jasmine workshop in the debate, in the per-information details.

Neoklis Stamkos, entrepreneur from KEPA, a Business & Cultural Development Centre (a private company with headquarters in Thessaloniki, Greece), explained that he fulfill his objective during this session because “we met people that we wanted to meet.” They are trying to create an organization and they need help with the paperwork and advice and there was the place where they could find people who help them.

The second session (26^th of June) had as a theme “The European Progress Microfinance Facility Reloaded: How can it work for you?”. Progress Microfinance was an interactive session, involving representatives from the Commission and Evers&Jung and past- and future- beneficiaries of the European Progress Microfinance Facility (EPMF). Positive and negative feedback on the facility were discussed as well as ideas and collaboration between partners.

Here, Meagan Andrews, research assistant from ICF GHK international company, explained that “I thought it provided a lot of different perspectives on ways to overcome the unique challenges for the Microfinancing industry in Europe.” Also, other participant summarized the two workshops as “clear, understandable, excellent introduction and very good materials and panelist.”

In relation to other sessions, Emmanuel Moyart, programme coordinator of Microfinance ACP/EU, gives some feedback for the “Back to the future...the European microfinance in 2033?” session. He explained that “the question looked interesting but later was more entertainment than something useful.”

HOGUERAS in Alicante II

18th at 00.00 in the Luceros´s square you can see the last of the fireworks/firecrakers at midnight. It means that the day after, 19th of June, Hogueras starts with the plantà or building of the monuments (the hogueras).

During the 19th to the 24th there are a serie of activities you need to keep in mind as the firecrakers at 14.00 everyday in the Luceros´s square:

Eating in the racós are the best part of it:

And of course everything goes along with music and dancing: 

And the climax of the hogueras, to burn the monuments in flames: 

Hoguera Hernán Cortés 2013 and their representatives: Belleza and Damas. Traditional dress of Alicantina.

Cremà

Uncertain Future of Capitalism

It is worthy to take a look at this video with Mr. Kay and Mrs. Mazzucato about Capitalism; or better say, market economies and innovation projects.

According to Mr. Kay modern business and the world of capitalism is misleading and they do not have the same meaning as they did in the Industrial Revolution. The term “ownership”, for example is not meaningful anymore for the world of capitalism, as well as the economics do not arrive anymore from the owner of capital. “Who owns the means of production does not matter”, says Mr. Kay. The point of view here is that there is a link between economics and political influence. Who are the owners of the shares of a company? That´s an important question that implies many answers within it: who decides the laws of the shares, who decides who votes, or the interest for that shares... Modern business is less about capital markets than it used to be.

Three characteristics of the market economy
      - Management of operations and the problem of coordination.
      - Experimental discoveries. Uncertainty means the impossibility of the unpredictability and the incapability to know the range of alternatives. Innovation rarely succeed?
   -Decentralization. “rent-seeking” activities. Breaking down concentrations. Looking for discipline, economic and political pluralism. 

On the other side, Mrs. Mazzucato talks about markets as the outcomes explaining that the value is the most important thing. Where does value come from an organization? Organizations interact collectively (collective process). And the state intervenes in thee process through funding resources; “everything that makes a company looks smart and not stupid was funding by the state.” 

Important points: 
      Public private partners = market unequal partners. 
      Nationalization is not innovative.
     The major challenge is to try to achieve a successful political mechanisms to improve market economies.                       
     Role of the state needs to be more pragmatic. 
     Regulations that understand all the process of the financial industry. Policy comes from theory. 


John Kay is a visiting Professor of Economics at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He contributes with a weekly column to the Financial Times. Also, he is author of many books, as "the Truth about Markets" (2003). 


Mariana Mazzucato, an economist, holds the RM Phillips Chair in Science and Technology Policy at the University of Sussex (SPRU). Her work focuses on the relationship between financial markets, innovation and economic growth.

http://www2.lse.ac.uk/newsAndMedia/videoAndAudio/channels/publicLecturesAndEvents/player.aspx?id=1921

Austerity Measures Are Not the Solution to the EU Debt Crisis

The Economic and Financial Affairs Council at LIMUN 2013 agreed that the Eurozone crisis needs global solutions. Its consequences spread beyond the borders of the EU and affect an interconnected worldwide market. The most likely solution to solve this problem is by global cooperation and trade. Additionally, there is a need for urgent implementation of the fiscal union.

The EU debt crisis is an international concern. As the delegate for China Mattias Verbergt pointed out “it is about all nations fighting against time” to solve a problem that affects everyone. The current financial market is so integrated that all nations feel the economic and financial consequences of the Eurozone. For example, India is a major trading partner of the EU and has been directly affected by the Eurozone crisis.

There are other alternatives

Greece is one of the countries most strongly affected by the crisis. The solution depends on what changes are made to the financial system. The delegate of Greece pointed out that “Alternative solutions have to be explored. Austerity measures will only cause more social unrest”.

Delegate of China

Delegate of China

The delegates from Saudi Arabia and China expressed their concerns on the situation saying that “austerity simply does not work for the EU” and that “these measures are not the only way”. Stimulating measures are necessary to revive the Euro currency.

The United Nations must come up with specific solutions that will not include the disintegration of the single currency. The delegate for Greece explained clearly that the 170% GDP in the country must be addressed, and if not, “Greece will be more like to leave the Eurozone”. Austerity measures have been implemented in Greece without any positive results. However the delegate for Greece acknowledged that “the EU has supported Greece with financial assistance of €34.4bn in the second bailout, and this shows the commitment of the EU for Greece to remain part of the Union”.

More financial investment and integration

The Eurozone is facing a double-dip  recession, where the Southern European countries of Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain are the worst affected. However, there are some positive examples too. The delegate for Italy said that the country won't ask for a bailout from the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). The delegate of Germany also stated: “Germany does not believe in the EU failing. We do not support austerity measures only, but we need control and supervision of member countries in order to see growth”.

Delegate of Germany

Delegate of Germany

All countries agreed that international cooperation is needed to face the debt default of the EU, and that protectionism and austerity are not the only solutions. What is needed is more economic and financial integration within the EU and international trading and investments with overseas countries.

Can the 2013 achieve the economic targets?

After more than four years fighting against the economic recession, it seems that 2013 can be the turning point for some countries. United Kingdom is expected to get out of the recession this new year, as forecast announces an economic growth of 1.2% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). However, the hit European countries, in which Spain is part of, will continue into stagnation. Spanish prevision of growth in the next year is still downturn, with a minus 1.2% decrease of the GDP in 2013.

UK´s economic strategy “is focussed on reducing the deficit, restoring stability, rebalancing the economy and equipping the UK to compete in the global race”, as the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, explained in the Autumn Statement to Parliament on 5 December 2012. On the other side, Spanish austerity measures have only contributed to increase unemployment (up to 25%) and to provoke more social unrest.

However, it it necessary to remark that neither UK nor Spain are likely to kept their forecasts of deficit reduction in the year that has just entered. The objective of Spanish deficit was 6.3% of GDP at the end of 2012, “but it could be (above that),” as the Bank of Spain governor, Luis Maria Linde, said last December 2012; although estimations yet predict Spanish deficit to drop to a 4.7% of GDP in 2013. On the other side, UK will also miss its deficit target from the 2013-2014 financial year, as the Autumn statement announced an escalation to 5.9pc of GDP, or £98bn, as Mr. Osborne indicated (hm treasury, Dec 5th, 2012). This data would indicate that the UK deficit next year could be higher than the Spanish's.

Therefore, new cutting measures will be necessary to reduce deficit and the extensive public debt. UK budget cuts are not significant, only 1.5% real cuts during 2012, if compared with Spanish ones where the most striking difference is that Spain does not include any measure to support growth as UK has setting up. For example, UK new policy includes increasing funding for UK Trade and Investments or helping smaller and medium-sized businesses access finance and support “from £25,000 to £250,000 for two years” as Mr. Osborne set out in the Annual Autumn Statement. This strategy can probably be the best solution to alleviate the financial situation; something that the European Union also instituted in its programme 2007-2013 “new funds, better rules”.